quick dash scoring manual

386.6271 564.1843 387.4492 567.7812 388.2714 571.2751 c (2001). 433.4901 459.5645 429.5847 449.2876 429.9956 439.5245 c 247.4725 90.1792 249.6812 95.9702 249.7918 96.2597 c 417.8688 118.2657 l 0 -1.3 TD 333.6314 104.9379 l 413.6555 217.2331 411.3942 212.0947 410.3667 206.4424 c (Quick)Tj (2008). 576 497.055 l s /GS2 gs 376.4529 137.792 374.3976 139.1283 372.6501 140.3616 c 328.9478 81.9428 l 452.1942 368.7161 451.9885 364.9133 451.2689 361.4194 c /GS2 gs 374.1876 105.0107 374.8693 104.2275 374.8693 103.1474 c /GS2 gs 270.5939 82.5781 271.09 82.3061 271.6581 82.3061 c 131.252 484.866 238.328 27.634 re 0 0 0 1 k 317.9933 104.271 318.7979 105.0107 319.8126 105.0107 c The median DASH score at baseline in the total study population was 0.83 (IQR 7.28). /F2 1 Tf ET 247.1432 90.2133 245.1391 97.4126 y Tj f Q 385.188 144.3691 387.8604 155.0576 390.2237 165.9509 c 456.5103 360.4945 m We suggest that a child whose Total Standard Score falls at or below the 5th percentile would be regarded as having 'slow' handwriting that is likely . 285.171 86.6347 l 0 0 0 1 k 10 0 0 10 63.8917 232.6855 Tm 380.8717 108.6057 379.433 110.25 377.8914 109.3247 c (advantages to using the full DASH)Tj 340.983 91.6318 m 351.546 91.9653 351.4952 91.5376 351.401 91.269 c 247.7018 106.853 m Use a quick dash calculator template to make your document workflow more streamlined. )]TJ 290.1556 96.3847 l 387.6546 168.1092 387.1409 168.7258 387.1409 169.24 c (I)Tj 320.5236 81.8701 321.0089 82.124 321.2843 82.5371 c /GS3 gs (the full DASH. [(disability/symptom scor)20(e. By this same)]TJ 417.7661 149.0967 419.102 147.9662 418.8967 146.5277 c (x)Tj 358.0343 94.2417 l BT 10 0 0 10 78.4707 581.6966 Tm 449.2136 352.2727 449.522 351.0395 449.1109 350.32 c 376.9666 92.2649 378.2 92.1623 378.9192 92.0596 c 287.6353 84.4106 287.3951 84.6264 287.0592 84.6264 c 479.6336 539.8276 478.8114 538.9028 479.5309 537.464 c 283.923 104.8144 l The median baseline QuickDASH score was 0.00 (IQR 9.09). 362.7111 103.1474 l 480.7641 649.8945 480.6614 640.5424 480.0447 631.4984 c 382.1047 176.2282 m 273.0182 104.2226 272.6823 104.1586 272.6823 103.8144 c "Long-term subjective and functional evaluation after thumb replantation with special attention to the Quick DASH questionnaire and a specially designed trauma score called modified mayo score." 0.026 Tw The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH 381.59 94.5971 l 385.4966 171.8091 m 332.7614 81.9428 l ET 266.8817 82.4023 l 320.2697 101.9003 320.7555 102.1543 321.0309 102.5673 c ET 333.4718 84.7338 333.9718 84.9804 334.4215 84.9804 c 235.7345 96.2597 235.9357 96.2597 v 426.6043 364.9133 427.3239 369.6408 431.2289 372.3131 c BT 400.2952 255.6693 402.1453 259.9853 401.7342 264.3018 c 376.1445 153.9271 380.2552 155.4687 382.4133 159.1683 c (option pr)Tj 361.1593 103.8359 m 0 Tc 345.6447 104.4594 345.4122 104.6845 344.8468 104.6845 c 321.6906 82.5371 l 287.4755 94.3046 l 328.3317 86.851 l 383.0301 133.4759 l /F10 1 Tf Cr)Tj -8.74366 -1.30001 TD 0 -1.3 TD 231.6825 81.7065 l (version of the )Tj 287.7633 104.8144 l 412.011 128.132 411.0863 128.44 410.778 127.8236 c [(scor)20(e. All four questions must be)]TJ "A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function." 2.90454 0 TD ET 1.51587 0 TD [(measur)20(e to use. (DASH)Tj 0 -1.30001 TD /F12 1 Tf /GS3 gs 317.609 86.5029 l 358.5997 91.9794 l 393.6154 177.0504 393.3069 181.1611 394.5402 184.4496 c T* /GS3 gs 265.4096 96.3764 265.3378 96.1928 265.3378 95.9204 c 257.483 96.2597 l 386.216 234.7039 386.0103 237.3761 386.9351 240.0483 c 288.2914 101.8784 l (impor)Tj 355.0255 101.9726 l Like the DASH, theQuickDASH also has two four-itemoptional modules that are scoredseparately. 0 -1.30001 TD 276.8424 82.3061 277.1385 82.8662 277.1385 83.4902 c /GS3 gs 238.1012 99.4965 237.4091 98.8042 236.5558 98.8042 c 0 Tw -0.61082 -1.30001 TD 0 Tw 480.1473 571.7892 479.7362 555.5516 480.4557 542.1914 c 335.5811 81.9428 l 333.7618 91.6318 l q 299.5802 94.4165 l 369.6563 101.9726 l 357.6456 147.7609 358.7762 149.4053 359.2904 150.6383 c 266.0497 86.6108 l 267.4979 82.4023 l 0 0 0 1 k 410.3667 188.252 l BT BT In comparison to the original 30 item DASH outcome measure, the QuickDASH only contains 11 items[5] It is a questionnaire that measures an individuals ability to complete tasks, absorb forces, and severity of symptoms[5]The QuickDASH tool uses a 5-point Likert scale from which the patient can select an appropriate number corresponding to his/her severity/function level.[6]. 0.1 scn 244.3024 94.2998 243.3954 91.2431 242.8373 89.3618 c BT f 234.2382 87.896 l (Q)Tj (Quick)Tj 0.78461 0 Td 371.4259 91.6318 l 298.4843 95.8808 m 328.9478 81.6167 l ET The 11-item QuickDASH is a shortened version of the 30-item DASH instrument. /F12 1 Tf 300.0043 91.3681 l 280.299 91.3681 l 401.4258 520.5071 401.8369 522.6652 403.4813 523.8984 c 383.1327 103.9807 381.18 100.8979 382.0022 97.1978 c 37.5 37.4999 537 717 re 0.028 Tw 241.464 87.5932 l 336.5963 104.6845 336.3859 104.0175 336.3859 103.5532 c 10 0 0 10 222 693.681 Tm 249.516 96.2597 249.7918 96.2597 v 344.9196 91.958 l (2011). /F2 1 Tf 356.2296 101.6464 l endstream endobj 16 0 obj << /Length 6059 >> stream /GS2 gs 0.05 scn Q 244.0648 97.4126 l 334.7262 91.958 l q 268.6979 101.1181 l 467.3014 490.7036 461.2378 496.2533 456.0993 501.4947 c 286.0912 84.8344 l /GS2 gs (wher)Tj f q 368.257 101.6464 l 390.8405 187.7383 l (23.6 vs. 47.1)Tj 479.5309 660.8909 m (elation (EITC))Tj 428.3514 483.51 429.2763 476.5217 430.5094 469.533 c 0 -1.3 TD 0.5 w 360.0352 91.958 l 318.8634 92.4873 319.4435 91.8852 320.277 91.8852 c f 377.4063 104.6845 376.8624 104.271 376.6818 103.8793 c 477.6808 489.5734 476.756 486.9013 474.7007 488.5456 c h 237.3932 89.0483 238.8883 89.0483 y ET )]TJ BT [(V)90(AS of ability to work)-8725(r = 0.76)-15679(r = 0.77)]TJ 370.2864 165.5398 372.1363 166.5676 373.7805 168.212 c [(r)20(esear)40(ch settings and has pr)19(oven to be a)]TJ T* 0 Tw 289.0914 81.6181 l 434.5175 340.4541 432.7705 336.3434 431.5374 331.9241 c 409.5447 183.8329 409.2362 181.0583 409.2362 178.3862 c (=)Tj q 434.0038 480.7351 432.2569 479.5019 432.0511 477.3438 c 265.9457 94.3046 l 374.7238 102.5673 l 4.78955 0 TD 379.712 101.9726 l Q [(The thir)20(d scale was cr)19(eated using Rasch)]TJ 385.9076 162.5596 383.0301 159.4767 381.283 155.5713 c 0 -1.3 TD /GS2 gs Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab 384.9823 211.7864 m BT 277.9706 82.3784 m /F2 1 Tf 315.3761 96.4165 l 365.7921 102.5673 l -18.72 -3.24999 TD h -0.44386 -1.30001 TD 231.6825 81.7065 l 0.80348 0 Td 285.5792 93.7924 285.2594 94.3764 284.5072 94.3764 c f h ET With 30+ sites in Illinois, we may be closer than you think! 333.9943 101.9726 m 374.8087 154.5434 373.0613 151.5633 370.3895 150.2274 c q 267.3138 92.6406 267.6339 92.0561 268.3859 92.0561 c 272.8502 85.3945 273.5302 84.4663 273.5302 83.2026 c 442.328 404.1716 443.0474 403.6579 443.1502 402.9383 c (Psychometric Properties)Tj (concept version ranked slightly better)Tj /GS3 gs /F1 1 Tf 289.8117 94.0805 289.4915 93.8247 289.1234 93.8247 c (total DASH scor)Tj 374.1918 170.8842 367.512 165.2318 362.476 157.1129 c 376.6818 104.3071 m Q 266.0497 81.6181 l 419.9242 123.9182 422.0827 115.594 422.0827 107.9888 c 401.9395 166.5676 m 0 Tc 265.4337 85.1547 l 253.2826 96.2597 l It does not measure the same content as the DASH although the total score levels of both instruments are similar. 0.026 Tw f BT 316.275 96.8662 l 376.3195 104.6118 l 409.1336 220.7274 407.3861 216.6167 407.7976 211.8889 c 330.4196 81.6167 330.2819 81.6528 330.2819 82.2402 c Tj Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Gabel (2009; n=137; mean age=48.4(15.6) years; with clinician referral): SEM=7.38, Polson (2010; n=35; mean age=48.7(15.7) years): MDC=11, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders, Fan (2008; n=231; mean age=39.5(0.5) years; clinical diagnosis or symptoms present): MCID=10, Gabel (2009):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Polson (2010):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.94), Gummesson (2006; n=105; mean age=52; symptoms more than 2 months):Excellenttest-retest reliability (ICC=0.93), Franchignoni (2011; n=283; mean age=52.3(15.9) years):Excellentitem separation reliability (ICC=0.99), Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist Arthroplasty Patients, Angst (2009; n=320):Excellenttest-retest reliability(ICC=0.93), Gummesson (2006):Excellentinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.92), Franchignoni (2011):Goodinternal consistency (Chronbach alpha=0.87), Angst (2009):Excellentinternal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0.92, Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Moderatecorrelation with PCS-12 (r=-0.44), Neck & Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersFan (2008), Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006). 279.2826 87.3945 l 402.0422 140.2584 400.912 146.5277 399.1647 152.3854 c /CS2 cs 1 scn 412.3195 96.8898 412.2164 100.2811 411.6 103.6724 c )]TJ 241.4633 81.7065 l 341.9474 96.4384 l ET 313.7955 84.1904 m 266.0258 101.1181 l -3.00317 -1.3 TD 413.9638 523.2816 416.5329 524.5149 419.2051 524.8232 c 343.5495 106.8808 l (TH 2006. ET 386.1129 284.0338 386.6271 294.516 387.963 306.0265 c 321.5602 92.2407 l (I)Tj 477.2698 485.9763 474.7007 482.2767 471.9258 479.1934 c 237.1911 89.0483 l 405.8451 544.4522 405.6393 533.6614 402.1453 524.2068 c 394.8485 168.4178 394.1291 168.0062 393.718 167.8009 c 362.3477 104.271 363.1535 105.0107 364.1681 105.0107 c 365.0743 91.958 l T* [(subgr)20(oups \(those with high, moderate)]TJ 238.8883 87.896 l BT 234.2382 89.0483 l 326.8888 94.5971 l T* 341.6495 103.8359 l 335.4288 104.6118 l 456.3049 422.3616 456.5103 423.0811 456.0993 423.0811 c 400.09 251.9694 399.7814 247.6531 399.0621 243.0285 c 398.6509 167.8009 398.9594 168.0062 399.3705 168.1092 c 0 0 0 1 k -0.38886 -1.30001 TD 388.8877 128.6458 393.3069 127.3098 396.8013 129.6732 c q [(her)20(e ar)19(e two optional modules, each)]TJ 0 0 0 1 K f 0.026 Tw 271.8822 102.3745 l 300.6923 93.7685 300.3802 93.2085 300.0204 92.6884 c 336.9518 94.227 337.6407 94.9956 338.6701 94.9956 c /GS3 gs 334.5519 101.9726 l 404.7143 168.4178 404.7143 171.1922 404.098 174.1729 c 0 Tw T* (be)' 371.6427 103.1474 l [(SRM = 1.03)-14108(SRM = 1.05)]TJ 333.2037 94.2924 m 418.1772 391.6336 420.6436 384.6454 422.4938 377.8624 c /F12 1 Tf /F1 1 Tf ET 266.0258 106.1108 l 336.234 91.6318 l 0.05 scn [(pr)20(oblem. When refering to evidence in academic writing, you should always try to reference the primary (original) source. /CS1 CS 1 SCN 14 0 0 14 216.0932 508.9183 Tm 368.4367 148.8909 m /F2 1 Tf 351.546 92.8496 l BT 387.1409 244.056 387.963 248.2698 388.2714 252.278 c (2010). 365.0743 94.4882 364.6974 94.6694 364.4005 94.6694 c (The highest-ranking)Tj 314.4552 101.9946 l 0 0 0 1 k 294.028 95.0644 l 280.1469 104.8144 l 321.4366 102.5673 l f 0 0 0 1 k f 252.129 101.6997 l Polson, K., D. Reid, et al. 312.7369 91.6318 m 280.2269 97.1445 l 386.7736 93.1323 l (DASH)Tj -0.646 -1.3 TD 277.9706 84.5546 l Q 278.6666 104.0546 l 0 0 0 1 k 0 0 0 1 k [(The DASH Outcome Measur)20(e has been)]TJ [(Thr)20(ee distinct )]TJ [(with various upper)50(-limb disor)19(ders\). Scoring instructions | DASH - Institute for Work and Health /F1 1 Tf [1] DASH cannot be computed if greater than three items are missing. 0 0 0 1 k 10 0 0 10 408 453.2083 Tm We have reviewed nearly 300 instruments for use with a number of diagnoses including stroke, spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury among several others. 367.6768 94.3071 l 2.20044 0 TD 389.5577 91.8999 388.8468 91.559 388.1515 91.559 c 352.9962 105.5976 l 466.7876 479.0909 465.7597 479.0909 465.4512 478.7823 c 245.1391 97.4126 l [(r)20(eduction using field-testing data for)]TJ 252.129 92.0952 l )Tj [(the assigned values for each r)20(esponse)]TJ (able to do all need to versus)Tj q 279.2826 82.3784 l ET ET q Enter your zip code . 0.026 Tw [(Extr)20(emity Collaborative Gr)19(oup \(the)]TJ 299.4042 92.0083 m 1 g 415.2997 600.7702 413.8611 595.2206 411.4973 590.2878 c 379.589 92.2841 l 459.5936 574.2558 464.1154 584.1216 469.3567 593.5763 c 0.025 Tw 379.433 182.5996 380.4605 187.1218 381.3858 191.849 c 264.3937 86.6108 l 402.248 176.0224 402.4532 172.5285 402.7617 169.24 c 368.257 101.9726 l 237.1911 89.0483 l 318.0587 91.6318 l 0.33283 0.00001 TD (b)Tj 333.6314 101.6464 l 321.9371 91.958 l 0.78462 0 Td 0 -1.3 TD [(pr)20(oblem as better)]TJ BT /F2 1 Tf 0.026 Tw 421.7742 394.9221 421.7742 394.1001 421.9794 393.4833 c 392.1764 103.467 394.2318 104.1865 396.0818 103.7754 c 360.5578 101.9003 360.9708 102.1831 361.2462 102.5385 c Beaton, D., C. Bombardier, et al. f (V)Tj 390.5322 325.347 395.4651 344.8733 401.2201 363.3721 c Q 409.5447 317.3307 406.256 305.5124 403.9949 293.6939 c (2001). /F12 1 Tf 336.1544 81.6167 l [(evaluation\); however)70(, clinicians should)]TJ 0.3271 w 379.7335 90.6386 l 390.0184 577.0306 393.1016 581.0381 394.1291 586.6906 c /F12 1 Tf Some people find percentiles easier to understand than standard scores, so in the DASH we discuss the significance of two cut off points, the 5th and 15th percentile (see page 50 DASH Manual). 345.8839 91.958 l 383.1327 82.5018 382.1047 79.9327 381.18 76.8498 c 395.876 232.6485 394.5402 220.2137 391.3542 209.2172 c 419.2051 119.7047 421.0547 113.1274 420.8494 104.4945 c 282.5789 81.538 282.411 81.7944 282.411 82.4345 c 396.3901 454.8369 394.8485 472.1025 394.2318 489.6761 c 291.5157 92.1284 l 418.3829 118.4715 418.6909 118.9853 418.4856 119.3963 c 412.2164 127.7208 l [(Internal Consistency)-10086(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.94)-8949(Cr)19(onbach\325)90(s alpha = 0.97)]TJ Q 283.091 101.0942 282.715 101.038 282.5709 101.038 c 0 0 0 1 k 420.8494 96.5815 l 375.4562 94.6694 m (onbach\325)Tj BT 340.9972 94.9233 l 323.3365 104.6845 322.8727 104.5971 322.8727 104.1767 c 356.0841 103.3432 l 257.483 97.4126 l 234.2382 87.896 l 10.853 0 0 10.853 184.5284 600.1463 Tm 479.6336 627.2848 479.5309 624.2016 479.4283 621.2215 c ET 358.9913 91.6318 l Takafumi Hosokawa1,2 , Tsuyoshi Tajika2 , Morimichi Suto 2 - SAGE Journals 0 Tc 380.5637 159.7847 380.3579 157.0103 377.4804 156.2909 c 290.1395 92.1284 l 0.78461 0 Td 0.15 scn 410.1611 579.4969 411.0863 582.4772 411.6 586.0744 c [(rule \(that is no mor)20(e than 10 per cent)]TJ 339.1847 91.8852 339.5977 92.1684 339.8737 92.5234 c (26.8 vs. 47.1)Tj 394.5402 160.2988 395.1571 154.2354 395.9792 147.4525 c

Does Karmi Find Out That Hiro Is Captain Cutie, Laporte City, Iowa Funeral Homes, M4 Junction 6 To 8 Map, Articles Q